The SEC's Continuing Trend of Identifying Aberrational Performance

On October 17, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged New Jersey-based Yorkville Advisors LLC (“Yorkville”), its founder Mark Angelo (“Angelo”), and its Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Edward Schinik, (“Schinik”) with intentionally overvaluing Yorkville’s assets under management and exaggerating Yorkville’s performance. The allegations state Angelo and Schinik made false statements to Yorkville’s investors and auditors concerning the value of certain investments in Yorkville’s funds; Yorkville’s valuation policies and use of third party valuation services; the value of the collateral underlying Yorkville’s investments, and the liquidity of Yorkville’s funds.1

The SEC further claims Yorkville’s malfeasance enabled Yorkville to mask the risky and illiquid nature of its investment strategy and charge funds at least $10 million in excess fees based on the inflated value of its assets under management.  In addition, the SEC claims that Yorkville attracted more than $280 million in investments from pension funds and fund of funds due to its portrayal as a firm that employs robust internal controls.  The firm’s boosted performance allegedly also enticed existing investors to make additional investments and attracted investors in new funds launched by Yorkville.

Yorkville invested in start-up or distressed public companies whose stock was not traded on a national securities exchange but quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board or “Pink Sheets” by making privately negotiated structured equity and debt investments in these securities.  Such investments did not have readily available market values. In its Private Placement Memorandum (“PPM”) and compliance manual, as well as in various due diligence questionnaires (“DDQs”), Yorkville made representations about the sound nature of its fair valuation. Yorkville’s PPM states that prices of securities and other assets that are not readily quoted by the market are determined by the good faith fair valuation of Yorkville but only when independent third-party valuations cannot be obtained in a timely manner which would rarely be the case. Furthermore, Yorkville’s compliance manual required Yorkville’s Valuation Committee to meet at least quarterly while the pichbooks, DDQs and other promotional materials stated that reviews by the Valuation Committee were performed monthly.  Yorkville also represented that the securities would be carried at fair value and not face value and that the fair value determination would be compliant with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).  Yorkville also represented that it would employ financial models to determine a best estimate valuation or otherwise determine that cost approximated fair value for the particular security.  The SEC alleges that none of these representations were true.  No independent third-party pricing or financial models were used; the valuations were not GAAP compliant; securities were valued at cost and not marked-down as appropriate to reflect “current fair and accurate market value” and the Valuation Committee did not meet or review any positions monthly.  Finally, Yorkville allegedly misrepresented to Yorkville’s auditors the amount of collateral coverage Yorkville had to protect its funds against downside risk and Yorkville’s cash and cash equivalent holdings.

Yorkville marks the seventh case that has arisen because of the SEC’s Aberrational Performance Inquiry (“API”), an initiative by the SEC Division of Enforcement’s Asset Management Unit that uses proprietary risk analytics to pinpoint hedge funds with ‘suspicious’ returns.2  At a Congressional hearing in March of 2011, Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, explained the SEC’s intention to focus on “anybody who is beating market indexes by 3% and doing it on a steady basis.”3 Also, at the October 2012 New England Securities Conference in Boston, discussing the role API has played in the SEC’s quest to “bring about fundamental changes in structure, attitude, and approach,”4 SEC Chairman Mary Shapiro stated, “we have brought questionable behavior to the attention of regulators in 17 countries-- a number of whom have asked for [the SEC’s] help in developing analytics-based approaches of their own.”5 Khuzami’s and Shapiro’s statements suggest the SEC will continue to proactively use its risk analytics approach to identify funds with aberrant returns.

Yorkville also stresses the SEC’s continued emphasis on valuation (also one of the focus areas of the Presence Exams.—see our previous Communiqué here and the SEC letter here). In addition to written policies, advisers must have well documented rigorous valuation processes that comport with those policies.  In particular, advisers with illiquid positions should have a Valuation Committee that meets at least once a month to review such positions and ideally use independent pricing and testing services. Since markets are constantly changing, Valuation Committee policies must be fluid. This means advisers should revisit their policies periodically to ensure that those policies remain adequate and up to date. With sound practices in place, advisers can ensure accurate appraisal and avoid raising the SEC’s ire.

If you are interested in additional information about how to implement these practices, please contact us.

[1]  See

[2] For additional enforcement actions brought by API, see “SEC Charges Multiple Hedge Fund Managers with Fraud in Inquiry Targeting Suspicious Investment Returns” at 

[3]  ‘Oversight of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Operations, Activities, Challenges and FY2012 Request Hearing before the H. Comm. on Fin. Servs., 112th Cong. 1 (March 10, 2011) (Testimony of Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement). There has been noaffirmative indication that the SEC is or is not still using 3% as its base figure. The comments of Robert Kaplan, co-chief of the SEC Division of Enforcement’s Asset Management Unit, at an interview illustrate the opaque nature of the SEC’s strategy. He stated, “We look at other measures than just raw performance--we look at outliers, but what is an outlier is determined in a number of ways.” ‘US SEC Shows Off First Results of New Analysis Programme;’ See"

[4] “Speech by SEC Chairman: Remarks at 2012 New England Securities Conference;” See for the SEC’s Press Release.

[5] Id.





Get the latest compliance news and insights - delivered weekly. The SEC3 Communique covers all compliance topics. CCO3 focuses on CCO topics.
tip: check both to keep informed!


SEC3 Newsletter

Commentary: How Compliance Officers & Firms Can Help Limit CCO Personal Liability This article originally appeared on the Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence subscription service for compliance and risk professionals and is... read more »

Wishing One-and-All a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year

We hope each of you found some peace and tranquility in the company of loved ones this holiday season and want to wish one-and-all a happy, healthy and prosperous New... read more »

Understanding How to Mitigate Liability and Navigate Insurance Options (Part II)

In June, we shared our thoughts around common insurance gaps and insurance riders that CCOs as well as managers should understand. One of the gaps we shared related to pre-claim... read more »

Cybersecurity - What have we learned and what have we done?

Regulatory Landscape In April 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC's") Division of Investment Management issued a guidance update, identifying cybersecurity as a critical issue. Several regulators are in fact focusing... read more »

Gatekeepers in SEC Crosshairs

Ever since the enforcement cases were announced as part of the SEC’s “Operation Broken Gate,” the SEC enforcement division has continued to ramp up scrutiny of gatekeepers including third-party service... read more »

Anna M. Bencrowsky, CRCP, CMFS Joins SEC3

We are pleased to announce that Anna M. Bencrowsky, CRCP, CMFS has joined SEC3 as a Senior Consultant. Prior to joining SEC3, Anna held several executive compliance positions. Anna recently retired... read more »


Upcoming Events - September & October 2017

Upcoming Events Don’t miss the opportunity to meet with us in person to discuss the topics that matter most to you. SEC3 is teaming up with industry experts in NYC to discuss...

May 23, 2017 - Webcast: WannaCry Ransomware: Were You Really Protected or Just L…

When: Tuesday, May 23rd, 2017 | Schedule: 12pm - 1pm EST Who: Paul Caiazzo, CEO and Co-Founder, TruShield Security Solutions Michael Brice, Founder, BW Cyber Services John Lukan, Managing Director, SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. We...

June 14, 2017 - Compliance Breakfast Briefing

8:30-9:00am - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:00-10:30am - Program Location: Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 600 Travis Street | Suite 2310 | Houston, TX Barry Barbash from Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP,...

June 13, 2017 - Compliance Breakfast Briefing

8:30-9:00am - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:00-10:30am - Program Location: Haynes and Boone, LLP | 2323 Victory Avenue | Suite 700 | Dallas, TX 75219 Validated parking is available in the garage attached...

May 31, 2017 - Chicago

9:00-9:30 a.m - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:30-11:00 a.m - Program Location: Baker & McKenzie LLP | 300 East Randolph Drive | Suite 5000 | Chicago, IL 60601 Kristin Gonzalez and Jerome Tomas...

May 17, 2017 (NYC WIMF)

This event is by invitation only. Please email to learn more.

May 15, 2017 (NYC Chief Compliance Officer Roundtable)

9:00-9:30am - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:30-11:00am - Program Location: Blank Rome LLP | The Chrysler Building | 405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174 | 22nd Floor Boardroom | Phone:...

Webcast: The Most Insidious Cybersecurity Threat Is Also The Least Understood

When: Tuesday, April 25th | Schedule: 12pm - 1pm EST Who: Paul Caiazzo, CEO and Co-Founder, TruShield Security Solutions Michael Brice, Founder, BW Cyber Services John Lukan, Managing Director, SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. Ransomware, the...

CCO Liability (Part III): Managing Liability Webinar

In this webinar, panelists discuss indemnifications and insurance as potential remedies to address the direct financial risks to a CCO. Attendees will learn: What terms and conditions should Chief Compliance Officers be...

Webinar: CCO Liability (Part III): Managing Liability: Navigating Indemnities an…

When: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 Schedule: 11:00am ET / 10:00am CT / 9:00am MT / 8:00am PT / 7:00am AT Description of Webinar: The National Society of Compliance Professionals is pleased to host...

Webcast: SEC 2017 Examination Focus Area – Cybersecurity Testing

Penetration Testing & Vulnerability Assessments - Examining the SEC & FINRA Requirements When: Wednesday, January 25th | Schedule: 12pm - 1pm EST Who: Paul Caiazzo, CEO and Co-Founder, TruShield Security Solutions Michael Brice, Founder,...

Chief Compliance Officer Roundtable: Breakfast Briefing

When: October 20, 2016 Where: Blank Rome LLP | The Chrysler Building | 405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174 | 22nd Floor Boardroom | Phone: 212.885.5000 Thomas Westle and Janaya...

Practicing Law Institute - Hedge Fund Management 2016

When: September 15, 2016 Where: New York & concurrent webcast | 1177 Avenue of the Americas | New York, NY 10036 Schedule: 9:00 am – 5:00 pm Janaya Moscony, President of SEC3 will...


When: April 13, 2016 Where: Blank Rome LLP | The Chrysler Building | 405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174 22nd Floor Boardroom Thomas Westle and Janaya Moscony, along with industry experts,...


When: November 17, 2015 Where: Convene Midtown East | 730 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017 Janaya Moscony, President, SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. will be moderating a...