Application of the Adviser Act's Advertising Rule to Private Fund Managers

The holidays provide the opportunity for us take a step back from the routine, remind ourselves of our priorities, and gain fresh perspective. Instead of being forced back to work and feeling completely apprehensive about returning to our professional duties, we can actually view the process with an appreciation for renewed perspective.

As 2011 commences and the effects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank") are being felt more and more, we believe this is a suitable time to revisit a few quandaries. We will do this over the next several communiqués. Today we want to iron out some of the confusion surrounding the applicability of Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") related regulations to private fund presentations, partner letters, and other materials. Specifically, we want to consider Rule 206(4)-1 ("the Advertising Rule"), under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") and associated guidance.

The Advertising Rule is a tricky one to raise with private fund managers given that private funds are prohibited from advertising and hence, the Advertising Rule should not be applicable. Generally speaking, if private fund advisers do not want to register their private funds, they cannot make a general solicitation or advertise. It seems pretty black and white, so why raise the topic? Investment advisers, whether registered with the SEC or not, are subject to the anti-fraud provisions of the Advisers Act. It is important to understand that the application of the anti-fraud provisions is dependent on the specific facts and circumstances. Section 206 of the Advisers Act specifically prohibits investment advisers from engaging in fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative activities. By extension, the materials created and disseminated by investment advisers, even if only related to unregistered funds and are for use only by sophisticated investors, are subject to these anti-fraud provisions.

The Advertising Rule was created to address prohibited advertising activities by registered advisers pursuant to the anti-fraud provisions. These prohibitions are very broad. Private fund managers would be well served to gain an understanding of these prohibitions as they would be better equipped to comply with the anti-fraud provisions. To clarify, this would be a best practice as opposed to hard fast rule applicable to private fund managers.

While private fund materials, such as due diligence questionnaires and letters to investors, may not necessarily be deemed "advertisements" as defined in the Advertising Rule, they share many of the characteristics of investment adviser advertisements such as presenting performance and commentary regarding an adviser's investment strategies. Thus, by applying SEC guidance to these materials, an adviser is following what the SEC has previously indicated will likely not violate the anti-fraud provisions.

The SEC Advertising Rule is relatively short with little detail. The SEC has issued further guidance regarding the Advertising Rule in the form of no-action letters which can be seen as a type of safety net for advisers. A no-action letter is the SEC's response to an investment adviser's (or some other interested party's) formal written request to the SEC requesting the SEC's feedback and whether or not the SEC would take issue with certain specific activities the investment adviser lists in its request. The SEC would generally respond with a detailed answer, specific to the facts and circumstances presented. If the SEC provides feedback that the agency would not take issue with the facts and circumstances presented, other advisers may engage in similar activities relying on the "no-action letter" requested by the original firm.

Specific Prohibitions and Limitations

Advertisements include any written communication addressed to more than one person that offers any analysis, report, or publication regarding securities or any graph, chart, formula or other device for making securities decisions, or any other investment advisory services regarding securities. An advertisement involves an offer of advisory services or products of the adviser. Note that the definition does not distinguish between prospective and existing clients. As mentioned above, the advertising rule has relatively few prohibitions. Among the prohibitions and limitations are those with respect to testimonials, past specific recommendations and, any untrue statements of material facts or statements that are otherwise false or misleading. It is important to understand that failing to make adequate disclosure is considered manipulative and misleading.

One of the most confounding restrictions under the Advertising Rule is that regarding past specific recommendations. The SEC's intent is to prevent advisers from "cherry picking" favorable investments and using them to represent the adviser's investment expertise or what a client may experience. Thus, registered advisers are prohibited from providing past specific recommendations related to transactions or advice made by the investment adviser that was or would have been profitable. Examples of past specific recommendations include mentioning specific securities in commentary to clients and using a representative investment in a standard presentation to illustrate an investment strategy. The SEC has provided limited no-action relief with respect to materials that include references to securities selected through consistently-applied, non-performance based criteria, such as top 10 holdings lists. Another exception is unsolicited requests, such as from prospective clients through requests for proposals or reports made to clients that are individualized or customized. As mentioned above, private fund materials may not necessarily be deemed advertisements. However, again we return to an adviser's responsibility to create and disseminate materials that do not violate the anti-fraud provisions of the Advisers Act. An adviser may forego mentioning past specific recommendations or apply the exceptions mentioned above, among others. An adviser may also want to contact its attorneys or compliance consultants regarding these exceptions as well as the appropriate disclosure to include when discussing specific investments in private fund materials.

The broadest prohibition in the advertising rule is that regarding making any untrue statements of material facts or statements that are otherwise false or misleading (or failing to make adequate disclosure). We have already discussed some of the applicability of this provision to private fund materials. The Clover no-action letter provides guidance regarding the use of performance in advertisements and disclosure that should be included so the materials do not violate the advertising rule and anti-fraud provisions. Using the disclosures provided in the Clover letter is a good first step when it comes to preparing private fund materials. An adviser should also consider other disclosures appropriate to the material(s). One size fits all disclosure is not a solution except for universally applicable disclosure such as mentioning that "Past performance is no guarantee of future results."

An Intertwined Relationship

In short, whether or not a private fund's materials are investment adviser advertisements is not really the primary consideration. First, the materials should be prepared with a view to not violating the Advisers Act's anti-fraud provisions to which all advisers, registered or not, are subject. Second, one should recognize that advisers and the private funds they manage are in an intertwined relationship. Registered advisers are subject to the Advertising Rule. The requirements of the rule and SEC guidance flows through to private fund materials not only as a means to protect the adviser, but also as a best practice to provide accurate, meaningful information to investors and potential investors.


Get the latest compliance news and insights - delivered weekly. The SEC3 Communique covers all compliance topics. CCO3 focuses on CCO topics.
tip: check both to keep informed!


Overlooked Benefits of E&O/D&O

While asset managers should always be aware of the protections provided by their E&O/ D&O coverage, there are more reasons than ever to think about it now. The SEC continues to... read more »

SEC3 Newsletter

Commentary: How Compliance Officers & Firms Can Help Limit CCO Personal Liability This article originally appeared on the Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence subscription service for compliance and risk professionals and is... read more »

Wishing One-and-All a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year

We hope each of you found some peace and tranquility in the company of loved ones this holiday season and want to wish one-and-all a happy, healthy and prosperous New... read more »

Understanding How to Mitigate Liability and Navigate Insurance Options (Part II)

In June, we shared our thoughts around common insurance gaps and insurance riders that CCOs as well as managers should understand. One of the gaps we shared related to pre-claim... read more »

Cybersecurity - What have we learned and what have we done?

Regulatory Landscape In April 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC's") Division of Investment Management issued a guidance update, identifying cybersecurity as a critical issue. Several regulators are in fact focusing... read more »

Gatekeepers in SEC Crosshairs

Ever since the enforcement cases were announced as part of the SEC’s “Operation Broken Gate,” the SEC enforcement division has continued to ramp up scrutiny of gatekeepers including third-party service... read more »


Upcoming Events - September & October 2017

Upcoming Events Don’t miss the opportunity to meet with us in person to discuss the topics that matter most to you. SEC3 is teaming up with industry experts in NYC to discuss...

May 23, 2017 - Webcast: WannaCry Ransomware: Were You Really Protected or Just L…

When: Tuesday, May 23rd, 2017 | Schedule: 12pm - 1pm EST Who: Paul Caiazzo, CEO and Co-Founder, TruShield Security Solutions Michael Brice, Founder, BW Cyber Services John Lukan, Managing Director, SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. We...

June 14, 2017 - Compliance Breakfast Briefing

8:30-9:00am - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:00-10:30am - Program Location: Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 600 Travis Street | Suite 2310 | Houston, TX Barry Barbash from Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP,...

June 13, 2017 - Compliance Breakfast Briefing

8:30-9:00am - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:00-10:30am - Program Location: Haynes and Boone, LLP | 2323 Victory Avenue | Suite 700 | Dallas, TX 75219 Validated parking is available in the garage attached...

May 31, 2017 - Chicago

9:00-9:30 a.m - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:30-11:00 a.m - Program Location: Baker & McKenzie LLP | 300 East Randolph Drive | Suite 5000 | Chicago, IL 60601 Kristin Gonzalez and Jerome Tomas...

May 17, 2017 (NYC WIMF)

This event is by invitation only. Please email to learn more.

May 15, 2017 (NYC Chief Compliance Officer Roundtable)

9:00-9:30am - Networking and Continental Breakfast 9:30-11:00am - Program Location: Blank Rome LLP | The Chrysler Building | 405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174 | 22nd Floor Boardroom | Phone:...

Webcast: The Most Insidious Cybersecurity Threat Is Also The Least Understood

When: Tuesday, April 25th | Schedule: 12pm - 1pm EST Who: Paul Caiazzo, CEO and Co-Founder, TruShield Security Solutions Michael Brice, Founder, BW Cyber Services John Lukan, Managing Director, SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. Ransomware, the...

CCO Liability (Part III): Managing Liability Webinar

In this webinar, panelists discuss indemnifications and insurance as potential remedies to address the direct financial risks to a CCO. Attendees will learn: What terms and conditions should Chief Compliance Officers be...

Webinar: CCO Liability (Part III): Managing Liability: Navigating Indemnities an…

When: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 Schedule: 11:00am ET / 10:00am CT / 9:00am MT / 8:00am PT / 7:00am AT Description of Webinar: The National Society of Compliance Professionals is pleased to host...

Webcast: SEC 2017 Examination Focus Area – Cybersecurity Testing

Penetration Testing & Vulnerability Assessments - Examining the SEC & FINRA Requirements When: Wednesday, January 25th | Schedule: 12pm - 1pm EST Who: Paul Caiazzo, CEO and Co-Founder, TruShield Security Solutions Michael Brice, Founder,...

Chief Compliance Officer Roundtable: Breakfast Briefing

When: October 20, 2016 Where: Blank Rome LLP | The Chrysler Building | 405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174 | 22nd Floor Boardroom | Phone: 212.885.5000 Thomas Westle and Janaya...

Practicing Law Institute - Hedge Fund Management 2016

When: September 15, 2016 Where: New York & concurrent webcast | 1177 Avenue of the Americas | New York, NY 10036 Schedule: 9:00 am – 5:00 pm Janaya Moscony, President of SEC3 will...


When: April 13, 2016 Where: Blank Rome LLP | The Chrysler Building | 405 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10174 22nd Floor Boardroom Thomas Westle and Janaya Moscony, along with industry experts,...


When: November 17, 2015 Where: Convene Midtown East | 730 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017 Janaya Moscony, President, SEC Compliance Consultants, Inc. will be moderating a...